cite as E. Fabbri, A. Habibi, and T. J. Schmidt, “Solid oxide electrolysis cells: Advances, challenges and opportunities,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 276, pp. 14–21, 2018.
Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cells (SOECs) have proven to be a highly efficient key technology for producing valuable chemicals and fuels from renewably generated electricity at temperatures between 600 °C and 800 °C, thus providing a carbon-neutral method for energy storage. The successful implementation of this technology on an industrial level in particular requires the long-term stability of all system components with a concurrent overall degradation rate of a maximum of 0.75% kh−1 or even better 0.5% kh−1, corresponding to a performance loss of 20% over approx. five years under constant operating parameters. However, the materials currently used for SOEC systems have been developed and optimized in recent decades for fuel cell operation. The degradation of these Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) materials used in SOECs, however, slows down the technology and market ramp-up. Accordingly, a selection and development of materials specifically for use in SOEC operation, must therefore be based not only on the highest performance but also on the lowest achievable degradation rate. In general, the systematic development of new SOEC materials must be driven towards key performance parameters such as mechanical, thermal, and chemical stability as well as an application-oriented assessment (cost effectiveness, simple manufacturing). This review presents the state-of-the-art materials in current industrial use for planar SOECs as well as future challenges regarding materials design and degradation. Recent advances in material compositions are discussed and evaluated in terms of their performance, stability, and potential for industrial implementation. In addition, a materials selection for interconnects, coatings, and sealants is briefly listed to outline current developments in these areas.
1. Rho, H.S.; Yang, Y.; Hanke, A.T.; Ottens, M.; Terstappen, L.W.; Gardeniers, H. Programmable v-type valve for cell and particle manipulation in microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 2016, 16, 305–311.
2. Zhang, X.; Zhu, Z.; Xiang, N.; Long, F.; Ni, Z. Automated microfluidic instrument for label-free and highthroughput cell separation. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 4212–4220.
3. Kim, H.; Kim, J.A microfluidic-based dynamic microarray system with single-layer pneumatic valves for immobilization and selective retrieval of single microbeads. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 2013, 16, 623–633.
4. Wang, J.-H.; Lee, G.-B. Formation of tunable, emulsion micro-droplets utilizing flow-focusing channels and a normally-closed micro-valve. Micromachines 2013, 4, 306–320.
5. Ishida, T.; McLaughlin, D.; Tanaka, Y.; Omata, T. First-come-first-store microfluidic device of droplets using hydrophobic passive microvalves. Sens. Actuators B 2018, 254, 1005–1010.
6. Gong, H.; Woolley, A.T.; Nordin, G.P. High density 3D printed microfluidic valves, pumps, and multiplexers. Lab Chip 2016, 16, 2450–2458.
7. Hwang, A.A.; Lu, J.; Tamanoi, F.; Zink, J.I. Functional nanovalves on protein-coated nanoparticles for in vitro and in vivo controlled drug delivery. Small 2015, 11, 319–328.
8. Cousseau, P; Hirschi, R; Frehner, B; Gamper, S; Maillefer, D. Improved micro-flow regulator for drug delivery systems. In Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (Cat. No.01CH37090), Interlaken, Switzerland, 25–25 January 2001; pp. 527–530.
9. Au, A.K.; Lai, H.; Utela, B.R.; Folch, A. Microvalves and micropumps for BioMEMS. Micromachines 2011, 2, 179–220.
10. Pourmand, A.; Shaegh, S.A.M.; Ghavifekr, H.B.; Najafi Aghdam, E.; Dokmeci, M.R.; Khademhosseini, A.; Zhang, Y.S. Fabrication of whole-thermoplastic normally closed microvalve, micro check valve, and micropump. Sens. Actuators B 2018, 262, 625–636.
11. Kawai, K.; Arima, K.; Morita, M.; Shoji, S. Microfluidic valve array control system integrating a fluid demultiplexer circuit. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2015, 25, 065016.
12. Kaminaga, M.; Ishida, T.; Omata, T. Fabrication of pneumatic microvalve for tall microchannel using inclined lithography. Micromachines 2016, 7, 224.
13. Pugliese, M.; Ferrara, F.; Bramanti, A.P.; Gigli, G.; Maiorano, V. In-plane cost-effective magnetically actuated valve for microfluidic applications. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 26, 045033.
14. Harper, J.C.; Andrews, J.M.; Ben, C.; Hunt, A.C.; Murton, J.K.; Carson, B.D.; Bachand, G.D.; Lovchik, J.A.; Arndt, W.D.; Finley, M.R.; et al. Magnetic-adhesive based valves for microfluidic devices used in lowresource settings. Lab Chip 2016, 16, 4142–4151.
15. Cheng, C.; Nair, A.R.; Thakur, R.; Fridman, G. Normally closed plunger-membrane microvalve selfactuated electrically using a shape memory alloy wire. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 2018, 22, 29.
16. Potkay, J.A.; Wise, K.D. A hybrid thermopneumatic and electrostatic microvalve with integrated position sensing. Micromachines 2012, 3, 379–395.
17. Vahid, B.; Boris, S. Flow control using a thermally actuated microfluidic relay valve. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2010, 19, 1079–1087.
18. Yalikun, Y.; Tanaka, Y. Large-scale integration of all-glass valves on a microfluidic device. Micromachines 2016, 7, 83.
19. Thorsen, T.; Maerkl, S.J.; Quake, S.R. Microfluidic large-scale integration. Science 2002, 298, 580–584.
20. Araci, I.E.; Quake, S.R. Microfluidic very large scale integration (mVLSI) with integrated micromechanical valves. Lab Chip 2012, 12, 2803–2806.
21. Oskooei, A.; Abolhasani, M.; Gunther, A. Bubble gate for in-plane flow control. Lab Chip 2013, 13, 2519– 2527.
22. Safavieh, R.; Juncker, D. Capillarics: pre-programmed, self-powered microfluidic circuits built from capillary elements. Lab Chip 2013, 13, 4180–4189.
23. Thurgood, P.; Zhu, J.Y.; Nguyen, N.; Nahavandi, S.; Jex, A.R.; Pirogova, E.; Baratchi, S.; Khoshmanesh, K. A self-sufficient pressure pump using latex balloons for microfluidic applications. Lab Chip 2018, 18, 2730– 2740.
24. Chang, H.J.; Ye, W.; Kartalov, E.P. Quantitative modeling of the behaviour of microfluidic autoregulatory devices. Lab Chip 2012, 12, 1890–1896.
25. Cornaggia, L.; Conti, L.; Hannebelle, M.; Gamper, S.; Dumont-Fillon, D.; Lintel, H.; Renaud, P.; Chappel, E. Passive flow control valve for protein delivery. Cogent Eng. 2017, 4, 1413923.
26. Kartalov, E.P.; Walker, C.; Taylor, C.R.; Anderson, W.F.; Scherer, A. Microfluidic vias enable nested bioarrays and autoregulatory devices in Newtonian fluids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2006, 103, 12280–12284.
27. Yang, B.; Lin, Q. Planar micro-check valves exploiting large polymer compliance. Sens. Actuators A 2007, 134, 186–193.
28. Yang, B.; Lin, Q. A planar compliance-based self-adaptive microfluid variable resistor. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2007, 16, 411–419.
29. Unger, M.A.; Chou, H.-P.; Thorsen, T.; Scherer, A.; Quake, S.R. Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multilayer soft lithography. Science 2000, 288, 113–116.
30. Zhang, X.; Xiang, N.; Tang, W.; Huang, D.; Wang, X.; Yi, H.; Ni, Z. A passive flow regulator with low threshold pressure for high-throughput inertial isolation of microbeads. Lab Chip 2015, 15, 3473–3480.
31. Zhang, X.; Zhu, Z.; Ni, Z.; Xiang, N.; Yi, H. Inexpensive, rapid fabrication of polymer-film microfluidic autoregulatory valve for disposable microfluidics. Biomed. Microdevices 2017, 19, 21.
32. Doh, I.; Cho, Y.H. Passive flow-rate regulators using pressure-dependent autonomous deflection of parallel membrane valves. Lab Chip 2009, 9, 2070–2075.
33. Zhang, X.; Wang X.; Chen K.; Cheng J.; Xiang N.; Ni, Z. Passive flow regulator for precise high-throughput flow rate control in microfluidic environments. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 31639–31646.
34. Natarajan, G.P.; Kim, S.-J.; Kim, C.-W. Analysis of membrane behavior of a normally closed microvalve using a fluid-structure interaction model. Micromachines 2017, 8, 355.
35. Zhang, X.; Huang, D.; Tang, W.; Jiang, D.; Chen, K.; Yi, H.; Xiang, N.; Ni, Z. A low cost and quasicommercial polymer film chip for high-throughput inertial cell isolation. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 9734–9742.
36. Chen, S.; Liu, Y.; Shen, Y.; Wang, J.; Yang, Z. The structure of wheel check valve influence on air block phenomenon of piezoelectric micro-pump. Micromachines 2015, 6, 1745–1754.
37. Hyeon, J.; So, H. Microfabricaton of microfluidic check valves using comb-shaped moving plug for suppression of backflow in microchannel. Biomed. Microdevices 2019, 21, 19.
38. Nguyen, N.-T.; Truong, T.-Q; Wong, K.-K.; Ho, S.-S., Low, C.L.-N. Micro check valves for integration into polymeric microfluidic devices. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2004, 14, 69–75.
39. Tanaka, Y.; Sato, K.; Kitamori, T. Assembly and simple demonstration of a micropump installing PDMSbased thin membranes as flexible micro check valves. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2009, 5, 516–520.
40. Jeon, N.L.; Chiu, D.T.; Wargo, C.J.; Wu, H.; Choi, I.S.; Anderson, J.R.; Whitesides, G.M. Design and fabrication of integrated passive valves and pumps for flexible polymer 3-dimensional microfluidic systems. Biomed. Microdevices 2002, 4, 117–121.